okay...great advice. I can see how it makes sense to go with an unordered list. I've also decided to use the background-image attribute for the two ends of the nav.
I've ended up with a totally different bunch of code, and i'm hoping that I could get one more critique on the techniques. i...
Tarwn,
Wow. Thank you so much for your thoroughness and for taking the time to explain this. It has been an immense help! You should think about doing an FAQ for those migrating from using tables for layout to using divs. There are a lot of them out there, but most are not thorough enough...
I am new to using divs and css for layout. I have a simple one row, 6 column table, and would like to know if I have missed a better way of coding it. Also, I have a css instruction to align the text vertically in the middle, which for some reason does not happen. Any suggestions there...
I am redesigning a site, and want to design it for quick easy updates. my question is .... What is best practice for meta tags and doctype declaration as far as using "includes"?
I want to be able to update one file, as opposed to many pages.
ALSO - rahter than use includes....I was thinking...
I use the same font-family for all text within a stylesheet, and over an entire site.
can I include this in the body css and will it be inherited throughout all of the other elements?
Thanks everyone for the input. I think I will go with something similar to this one:
|---------------------------|
| page head |
|---------------------------|
| menu | main heading |
| | two lines of text |
| | main content |
| |...
Wullie,
I have that initial landing page, which will have the two options...esentially a "fork in the road", but the problem I have found is that the true homepage is not often landing page.
I have tracked and found that over 50% have bookmarked section 1, go there automatically, hence, my...
Thanks for the input.
That just may work.
The site is layed out in such a way that could accommodate that. The page has a minimalist look to it, so anything would really show up.
What do you think of an idea I had...Basically, pushing the content down a few lines, and adding a few lines of...
I am requesting some input/opinion on one small thing...
I have a website (which I will leave out at this point, to keep responses pure and unbiased) wich has a small, but loyal, base meaning that the small group who use it, use it often. There has been only one main section to this site up...
Hello All,
The following did fix the browser difference. It removed any spacing determined by the <ul> which browsers treated differently, and allowed me to use the <br /> tag to add a blank line that will be displayed the same by most browsers.
[code]
margin-top: 0px; padding-top: 0px...
THanks! Guess I should have posted the UL css i was using...it is a little more complex than that.
css
.toplinks-ul li {list-style-type: none; margin-left: 0; padding-left: 0; display: inline; margin-top: 2em; padding-top: 0;}
.toplinks-ul li a {display:block; padding-left: 15px...
OKay...so here it goes....
I have an unordered list. In IE, there is no blank line above it, however, FF displays one, as though there was a <br /> there.
Any ideas on how to get around that difference?
An alternative would be to write a script that did the counting you were looking for. There are thousands of free scripts out there for tracking web traffic.
1 of two ways...
1 - give each user an account, and have them log in using their creds.
2 - allow anon access (most likely not feasible, but it IS one way nonetheless)
This could be due to your file-type assiciations on the client machine. Check those out and see which programs are set to handle the file type in question.
There are various products out there that will give you a myriad of visitor information by analyzing the IIS logfiles. You can google search iis logfile analyzer for some results.
alternatively, you could write a script that will increment a count. Lots of free code out there. These can also...
okay...PHV.....
that last one works, but it is inserting the date 1899, and not 2005 as it should.
THis has thrown me for a loop...how can this be resolved, and why is it choosing 1899?
Thanks again!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.