Search results for query: *

Has anyone seen this: 227 Entering Passive Mode (x,97,145,7,248,236) connecting data channel to x.97.145.7:248,236(63724) data channel connected to x.97.145.7:248,236(63724) LIST ) And nothing gets returned. The connection hangs.

So that one static is bidirectional? Can I use the static with an ACL? Ex. fixup protocol ftp 21 static (dmz, outside) 1.x.x.1 10.x.x.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0 access-list outside permit tcp any 1.x.x.1 eq ftp access-group outside in interface outside Will this permit both passive and...

I have a server in the DMZ that provides ftp service to the outside. When I use the static statement to nat the outside to the inside, do I also need a nat statement for the dmz to the outside? static (dmz,outside) 1.X.X.1 10.X.X.1 255.255.255.255 0 0 nat (dmz) 1 10.x.x.1 1.x.x.1 global...

Yes, everything works fine from the inside. Ftp active, passive, ssl On the outside, active does not work, ssl works but it displays the internal ip, and every once in a while passive does not work. Getting errors that data channel could not be established.

Oops that was a typo on my part. Everything is 10021 and 10020 for the data. I removed the fixup on 10020 because that was in error..

Well something is not right then. Let me see... Here is the config: interface ethernet0 100full interface ethernet1 100full interface ethernet2 100full interface ethernet3 100full nameif ethernet0 outside security0 nameif ethernet1 inside security100 nameif ethernet2 dmz security50 hostname...

Does the pix support multiple entries for the fixup protocol ftp statement. I know that it accepts the command, but does it actually work. ex: fixup protocol ftp 21 fixup protocol ftp 1021