Search results for query: *

DjangMan, your example was of great use to me. If you look, you'll see that Accpac opens a second view of AR0400 customer optional fields and does not compose it with the customer header records. That view can be browsed without issuing a customer ID. Works like a charm!

That's very helpful and gives me confidence this will work. I'll take a careful look at what's different in my browse, fetch, etc. I'm using C# so the syntax is a bit different for the quote wraps but it should be equivalent. Thanks again.

Thanks for the assistance DjangMan. Unfortunately, the where clause you recommend returned no results. The OPTFIELD and VALIFBOOL syntax appears to be working since I can control the result in code example 1 (above) by unchecking my enabled optional field in the Accpac UI. To me, that seems...

Understood, and originally I thought view composition would allow me to relate the two. However, I am not even able to browse the optional fields with just those entries in the where clause. To be crystal clear, the following browse gives a single fetch result with the enabled value...

Thanks for your reply. ARCUSTOMER1detail above does in fact refer to AR0400, so I thought I was following suggestion 1. Can you point to what I'm doing wrong there? I can provide a few more lines from the code if tha thelps.

We've added a boolean optional field to the customer record (AR0400) in Accpac 5.6 and would like to browse customer records (AR0024) where the optional field "ENABLED" is True. I can search for records that have the optional field set to true via the finder in Accpac, but the browse criteria...

Apparently, it is related to the latest kernel patchset. We're going to upgrade a working server to that patchset and confirm. If that's the case, we're going to have to do a lot of testing to confirm 2.4.1 is a stable threading model for Tomcat on our version of Linux. We have been through...

LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 works like a charm, but Tomcat documentation prescribes that for Redhat Linux 9.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 3 (Taroon Update 3) Linux webforms05 2.4.21-20.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Aug 18 20:46:40 EDT 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

sedj - Sadly, this occured first on Tomcat 5.0. Upgrade to 5.5 was our first attempt to resolve the issue. Also, other Linux servers can successfully run this configuration. They seem to have a slightly different Linux patchset.

Thanks sedj - We're specifying -Xmx much higher than 256m, but from my reading online, "unable to create new native thread" is not really related to heap size. There's a good amount of detail online regarding how Linux upgraded their threading model, causing java's monitor to stop letting new...

When starting an empty/basic standalone Tomcat 5.5 on Linux kernel 2.4.1, GLIBC 2.3, with Java 1.5.0 and LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 we receive the following exception. Removing LD_ASSUME_KERNEL resolves the problem, but the release notes specify it, and we've heard the server could lock up without...

As I understand it, one should pad the left side with zeros until the precision is reached, resulting in: 0 .01 .01

Is an N2 with a length of 1 valid EDI? If so, what is the value of the following N2 transmissions? 0 1 01 Thanks in advance!

I'd like to set header fields on a browser request. This would allow me to satisfy basic authentication requirements (user-pass). This can be done from DotNet and from Java clients easily, but I'd like to avoid a download. Does client-side JavaScript offer access to the request header?