Search results for query: *

Thanks for posting your config. For NAT, you'd want to do something like the following: First remove your existing NAT statement (this will interrupt anyone currently using it): no ip nat inside source list 1 interface ATM0/0/0.1 overload Next, make sure each WAN interface has "ip nat outside"...

Fade, Since all your WAN links have equal bandwidth, you shouldn't need anything fancy like OER. You'll need to do the following: 1) Setup the dialer interfaces for each of the WIC's. It sounds like you have one working already, so this is just a matter of repeating what you've already done...

I have 2 routers in different physical locations, each router has 2 WAN interfaces from separate ISPs. All the WAN interfaces are up and carry traffic. My problem arises when I try to telnet to either router from a different location (i.e. home). For the sake of discussion, let's say the IP...

The purpose of those was to limit each users amount of bandwidth, but still utilizes the full capacity of the link. Those statements aren't quite correct for that to work though. Turns out that you don't need the output statements and you only need the input statement on each wan link. So...

Thanks for your help. I added: "access-list 101 permit ip any any" and then "rate-limit input access-group 101 256000 256000 256000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop" to each WAN interface and it started working. I didn't need to add it to the vlan.

I implemented the rate-limit command as you suggested, but it doesn't seem to work. My method of testing the rate limit is to simply download a large file from the Internet. If the rate-limiting is working, my expectation was that I shouldn't be able to download faster than 64KB/sec. However...

Yes, I'm using NAT on the interfaces. I believe I have it working. I haven't generated any statistics on how well it's load balancing, but by watching the counters on the interfaces it looks like they are all being shared. Here's my config if it helps you: 2811#show run brief Building...

Changing it to use vlan 1 seems to have corrected this. I'm not sure why it didn't work with vlan 2. Oh well.

Hello again, So I have a semi-complicated setup that I'm trying to get working one piece at a time. I've also posted in another thread about load balancing, but before I get to that, I want to ensure that basic connectivity is working. Basically what I have is a 2811 with a HWIC-4ESW that I...

I will give it a try and post back here (with a running config if it works) with the results. Thanks again for the suggestion. It definitely looks like it's designed for what I need.

tech, OER seems like it will do exactly what I want! A couple questions: 1) You mention "You will need CEF on but..". The way you word it makes it sound like CEF has some disadvantages? 2) Do you think GLBP suggested by Kisco will not work for what I'm after? If it will work, can you say why...

Exactly. For my application, I didn't really think I needed a routing protocol. It looks like GLBP may do what. In their examples they are implementing it on 1 interface in multiple routers, but I suppose it could be enabled on multiple interfaces in one router? Do you think I need to use...

By already in use, do you mean what routing protocol the providers are using? There currently is no mechanism for providing failover other than the fact that the router will have 2 WAN intefaces. The DSL link will be for a standard Internet connection. Thanks for your help.

Hello again, I have a 2811 I'm setting up with both a T1 and 5Mbps DSL WAN interface. Virtually all the traffic through the router will be to provide Internet connectivity to a group of users on a LAN behind it. I know that IGRP (and EIGRP) include the bandwidth of the connection as part of...

Apologies. In previous post go=not.

That makes sense. It's a subtle difference that's important though. Basically, with an access list it rate limits per IP/User/Host, allowing full utilization of the WAN interface. Without the access-list, it's restricting the WAN interface itself to go use more than a certain amount. (As you...

Ok, And not to belabor the point, but just to be sure I'm clear. If I were to implement the above commands (without the access-list) multiple users will be able to use up 200K each, until the full utilization of the bandwidth is taken. For example, if I had one T1 WAN connected, and 2 LAN users...

KiscoKid, Thanks for the reply. I'm glad it should be easy. I do have a couple follow-up questions: 1) Can you further explain why you included the line "ip address a.b.c.d 255.255.255.252"? Is that the IP address of the interface? 2) I want to verify that this will limit the rate for each...

Hello, I want to restrict traffic on my LAN so that no one user uses too much bandwidth. I understand that the rate-limit command is a good way to do this. Let's say that my users are assigned addresses in a 192.168 network and I want to restrict all the IP's in that range to 200k of bandwidth...

Thanks for the info. I will see if I can get our customer (who owns the VPN gateway) to set this up.