Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations strongm on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
Search results for query: *
- Users: jefflessard
- Order by date
-
Seqeuence problem!!!
Actually it seems that no explicit lock is required, asx you can read in postgresl manual (v7.3) : LOCK [ TABLE ] name [, ...] IN lockmode MODE ROW EXCLUSIVE MODE Note: The commands UPDATE, DELETE, and INSERT acquire this lock mode on the target table (in addition to ACCESS SHARE locks on any...- jefflessard
- Post #9
- Forum: PostgreSQL Inc.: PostgreSQL
-
Seqeuence problem!!!
So here is my problem answer, if anybody needs it... I created a plpgsql function returning the max value + 1 of the given column name in arguments (must be quoted with ') and if there is no value (empty table) returns 1. In the create table definition, i removed the serial datatype and...- jefflessard
- Post #6
- Forum: PostgreSQL Inc.: PostgreSQL
-
Seqeuence problem!!!
This is good... but... I need an ordered sequence number, there will be no delete on this table, so, is anybody knows an effecient way to do so in postgres? Thanks for your help- jefflessard
- Post #4
- Forum: PostgreSQL Inc.: PostgreSQL
-
Seqeuence problem!!!
Hi, i would like to know if there is any way to bypass this sequence problem? ... create table myTable ( pk SERIAL PRIMARY KEY, value varchar check(value!='') ); ==>insert into myTable (value) values (''); ==>ERROR: ExecAppend: rejected due to CHECK constraint mytable_value it's still ok...- jefflessard
- Thread
- Replies: 10
- Forum: PostgreSQL Inc.: PostgreSQL
