The point is, if I say "ATM" you don't know what I'm talking about,
but if I say "ATM Machine" you do know what I'm talking about.
Which of these two sentences is more clear:
Is it possible that an ATM (machine) could communicate via ATM (mode) ?
Is it possible that an ATM could communicate...
In following this thread, I have seen the terms
"ATM machine" and "ATM mode"
Which makes me wonder if there might be times when the
redundancy actually helps resolve some ambiguity ?
If I just say "ATM" right now, do you know what I'm talking about?
hmmm... This is what I get from valgrind:
==28881== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
==28881== malloc/free: in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
==28881== malloc/free: 0 allocs, 0 frees, 0 bytes allocated.
==28881== For counts of detected errors, rerun with: -v...
You can also do this with ActiveX/COM, which will give
you control over a lot more of IE's features/settings...
http://www.cryer.co.uk/brian/delphi/howto_openiespecificetc.htm
It looks like /dev/hda4 is an extended partition, and /dev/hda5
is a logical partition that sits on top of it.
If that's the case, then /dev/hda5 is the one to mount.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.