I've read that there's some sort of issue(s) when using .NET Framework v1.0. Supposedly, .NET 1.1 fixes this. I found a great link for this - but can't remember it!! For now, try this link:
http://www.gotdotnet.com/team/changeinfo/Backwards1.0to1.1/default.aspx#00000106
We have a web service running (ASP.NET) that receives data from an external provider. Once we receive the data, we have approx 120 seconds for any one of our customers to view and respond to the data (it's a request for service, if our customers don't answer within the time limit, the external...
I, myself, have been tied up with other projects. I plan on playing with the Iframe idea later this week (hopefully!).
One trick I've heard is to use a frame within a frame - but I don't know if this is feasible or even necessary with .NET.
Isadore, could you provide more detail on how to use the SRC? I'm guessing that, in your case, your chart was an image? How could I use SRC to point to another web page?
Thanks again.
Good info, thanks guys. I'm going to try both ideas. Let me provide more info on my aspx page:
-there are actually two datagrids but both use the same dataset. I separate the data using a filter. The first grid shows "new data" while the second grid shows "the rest"...
I have a web page in ASP.NET that is set to refresh every x seconds. This page contains a datagrid (and a few other items) that shows records from an SQL Server 2000 database table.
The problem is that the whole page refreshes every time and is annoying to the user. I NEED to refresh so that...
As a rule, we ALWAYS use SET NOCOUNT ON (except where counting is needed). So, my stored procedure already has it set.
For now, I went ahead and SET ANSI_WARNINGS OFF and that took care of the problem.
Thanks for your help!
We have a complex stored procedure that aggregates data (uses a group by clause, among many other things). This query, when run in the SQL Query Analyzer, returns the following SQL Server warning:
Null value is eliminated by an aggregate or other SET operation
But, it still returns the data...
I found out that security setup was PART of the problem. Once I fixed up the security issue, there was still the issue with calling CoInitializeEx to setup COM. Since this is an NT service, calling CoInitializeEx at app startup (actually, at class instance start-up - C++ you know!) would not...
I have written a VB6 ActiveX DLL and successfully installed/accessed it on a remote server (via COM+). I've also written a C++ NT service that must access this remote COM+ app.
If I run the C++ application as a console app (vs as a true NT service), it works. But, once installed as an NT...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.