Search results for query: *

that is because of the way the input is fed into the program. WHen you ask for choice, you (ie scanf) waits for new line to be pressed before seeing the input. Since you are reading a 'char' only, this newline is in the input buffer and that is what your next getchar (or even scanf) will see...

type this in command mode in vi :%s/^V^M//g Basically your are removing the ctrl-M character from the file. You will have to type ctrl-V before typing ctrl-M. Mohan

Hi Kumar, try gdbx. Mohan

Depends on the scope you are looking at. You could try to build a memory manager if you are looking at something decent but not that complex. Will give you good exposure to pointers, linked lists etc ... Mohan

Hello mike, Do the following $ for file in `ls -1` > do > echo "file is [$file]" > # do whatever you want to do here > done Mohan

Hi Kumar, The core file contains all the process information pertinent to debugging: contents of hardware registers,process status, and process data. You can do a "man core" and see all the gory details. You can use the core file to debug and see where and how the program failed...

Hi Kate, Try this while Line=`line` do echo &quot; $Line&quot; done < filename This should work in bourne/K shell. Mohan

Hi, I need to know the equivalent of pmap command of Solaris in Tru64. pmap of solaric gives the foll output $ pmap pid 23349: bash 00010000 432K read/exec /usr/bin/bash 0008A000 80K read/write/exec /usr/bin/bash 0009E000 168K read/write/exec [ heap ] FF100000...

It all depends on how you do it. Since every c program is a c++ program, does that mean you are just using different compilers ? In that case i dont think there will be any difference(atleast with gnu compilers). But to comment on generality, C is faster. Mohan

ensure that the path of the scripts is in your PATH env. For your case do the following setenv PATH .:$PATH After this, the scripts will execute just by the name. If you are very sure, you could add this to your .cshrc file Mohan

The best way i think is this #!/bin/bash num_sii=`ls /home/sii/incoming/ | wc -l | tr -d ' '`; if [$num_sii -eq 0] then echo &quot;There aren't any new files.\n&quot; else echo &quot;There are $num_sii new responses.&quot; ... fi

You could do something like this ... find . -name &quot;$dat&quot; -exec ls -Fd {} \; 2>/dev/null | awk '{.............}' This should work.