What puzzles me is that there is only one record per entity with a #71 and only one with a 74 - to me the MAX function is redundant - there is nothing to compare to, but it's working and I will just take it as it is :-)
I am going to use this last method though instead of mine because I have a...
Yes yes and yes to your comment
[ "If this works, and you would like me to explain, just let me know. Also, if you are interested, I can show you a another method for returning the same data with less joins, which will perform better. "]
Wow - it worked! Thank you so much :-)
I never would have thought to do that though. Is this a change in the way the data is handled in 2008 as opposed to 2005? Why do I need a Max now when I didn't before?
Either way - thanks again!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.