Search results for query: *

Yep, that's true. Fortunately a lot of the configuration will occur on ports that are currently unused (e.g. between the switches and new APs); there are only a few inter-switch trunks that need to be configured. (We're very, very small.) Thanks, guys! If you think of anything else, I'm...

Thanks man. I didn't think there was a problem with it, but you can probably tell by the fact that I used "trunk" in the Cisco sense that I don't play with HP all that much. Looks like there may be nomenclature diffs with dot1Q tagging, as well. At any rate, this info will help me define the...

Hey All. I've got a ProCurve 4108GL and I will be implementing VLANs in the future. If I were to configure (as an example) port 1 to be a trunk, set it to use VLAN 200, and leave it untagged, would that cause any interruption in the connection to the native VLAN devices already connected...

Update Failed (Memory Allocation Failed.)" Interesting error, and one that seems to have no documentation anywhere. The Symptoms: 1. The PC reports a nondescript update failure error, saying that the connection to the server failed. 2. The contention that the connection to the server failed...

Depending on how the sites are set up, the VPN link can make the two sites appear as if they are all on the same subnet. In such a case, so as long as the VPN is up, Servers and other devices at either site are accessible to both sites. By similar means you can force Site A to use the Internet...

Thanks, folks. Adding the command IP ROUTING did the trick. Another issue that came up was that since these are production PCs (which explains the enormous subnets, Bill), one of them had the wrong DEFAULT GATEWAY configured (it was config'd to use the production router, not my test router)...

I think you're missing the point. Let's simplify the configuration: [PC1]--[RTR]--[PC2] PC1 = 128.100.26.55 Connected to f0/0 PC2 = 10.0.0.100 Connected to f0/1 * The PCs cannot ping one another. * The RTR can ping both PCs. The router has been completely wiped and only the FE interfaces...

Would that really cause the router not to route traffic coming in on f0/0 out through f0/1? I would not think that a router would rely on RIP updates from another router in order to route traffic through itself. How would that work, exactly? Remember, I'm not the least bit concerned about...

Actually, I'm not too concerned with passing traffic through the Gateway Router (GW RTR) just yet. It is configured not to allow 10.x.x.x traffic. Permitting traffic at the gateway will be one of the final steps. The main issue in this case is that the traffic from the production network...

Hey folks, Refer to this diagram: [Test PC]--[RTR]--[SW]--[GW RTR]--[Inet] Test PC is connected to RTR int f0/1 RTR = c2621 SW = HP4108 switch (connected to RTR int f0/0 GW RTR = c2811 The Problem: From the Test PC I can: 1. Ping RTR int f0/1 2. Ping RTR int f0/0 ...but cannot: 1...