Search results for query: *

Hello, I need to open a file in edit using a batch job. I thought I would use a rexx statement that looked something like this: ADDRESS TSO "EDIT DATASET('"||DSN||"')" When I run this code I get a return code of 12. The job listing contains no error description of what the actual problem...

sorry guys didn't mean to leave ya hangin... My problem is solved, it was a compiler issue with the new version of LE we installed. They systems guys did not match compiler options with the ANS4 compiler. Anyway that problem is solved but to answer your outstanding questions: Gobelza: No...

Webrabbit, my understanding is that PFD is for preferred sign. This is what it actually does. I got this from the IBM Peformance Tuning Manual Using the NUMPROC(PFD) compiler option generates significantly more efficient code for numeric comparisons. It also avoids the generation of extra...

This is what was happening on that move. The current LE compiler option was packing the fields prior to the move where as the ANS compile was not. The assembler code below shows what the compiler was doing: LE compiler shows fields being packed: 2844 MOVE...

Here are my field descriptions, code and displays FIELD DESCRIPTIONS: Here are the field definitions from each of these 01 WS-DATE-YEAR PIC S99 VALUE ZERO. 04 PC-C-VEH-YEAR-R. 06 PC-C-VEH-YEAR PIC S99. 05...

Razalaz and Crox thank you for your posts!! The fields are both display fields which is why it seem so odd that this is happening. The same code is running succesfully in production in ANS form, Convert it to eCob or even cob2 and the data becomes corrupted. I'll try the pic xx redefines...

Hello, I have a question about an eCobol conversion that I am working on. What's happening is I am moving a PIC S99 field to another PIC S99 field and the values are changing. The sending field has a value of 90 and the receiving field after the move contains a value of 9{ . I have never seen...