Yep, that was what I was afraid of.
I was hoping I wouldn't have to code classes for each of the (multiple) UDT's I need to handle. I have that in hand and it works, kinda. I was just looking for a more elegant solution if one was to be had.
Doesn't look like there's a way around it...
To be specific, I'm talking about collections, not dictionaries.
Here's an example of what I'm talking about:
I also tried wrapping the collection in a class and setting then setting a reference to a new instance of that, but that didn't do any good either...
This is the snippet I tried when...
Gah!
Okay, I have a structured set of data and I need to create collections or dictionaries of instances of these sets and I can do this with classes. In fact I have done this. It works.
But I'm looking at that list of modules and realizing how far I have to go in this project and asking...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.