Search results for query: *

Thanks VPNSteve, but that didn't work either. Whether or not that 172.20.0.0/16 subnet is configured on the 600, it does not affect either the 10.0.0.0 or the 172.29.14.0 subnet. They still act the same. 10.users can reach 172.20.1.12, but 172.29.14. users cannot. I took the subnet out of...

Sure. Here's some more detail. On the Instant Internet 100: (Branch Office) ipsec vpn remote 10.0.0.0/8 ipsec vpn remote 172.29.0.0/16 ipsec vpn remote 192.100.1.0/24 ipsec vpn remote 192.100.2.0/24 ipsec vpn remote 192.7.1.0/24 ipsec vpn remote 192.168.0.0/16 ipsec vpn local 172.20.0.0/22...

Hi all, We have a remote site with a Contivity 100 tunneling back to a Contivity 600 that sits at the main office. The branch connection seems to be working fine, but the issue is that end users who vpn to the 600 cannot reach resources on the Contivity 100 branch site. I have already...

That could have been it. On the web interface, there is a setting for "AutoPVID". In JDM, does it not do AutoPVID? Even though you assign the members of the vlan, do you have to edit each port and assign the default Vlan id on the Vlan tab?? Of course I'm done now, but will try to recreate...

Thanks for responding, Jynxx. No, there was no error message. It acted like it created them fine, but devices within the same vlan could not talk. It acted as though each port were its own seperate vlan. We went over to the web interface and created them and it worked fine.

I was recently trying to configure some port based VLAN's on a BS470 via JDM 5.8.3.0 and it did not work. After failing intitially, I went to the "Help" in Device Manager and made sure to follow the steps listed and it still failed. I was able to configure them using the browser interface...

Is it possible to "hot swap" fiber mda's in a Baystack 450?