Hi List,
I have a 515e failover pair which I have been tasked to manage. I'm wondering how I go about modifying the configuration.
Do I only have to modify one of the firewalls, or both separately?
Hi List,
I am designing a VRRP solution for a WAN Gateway at multiple branch office locations. Each location has a router which will provide gateway access to the WAN for 2 different interfaces.
However we would also like to fail over the WAN, as it's IP address must be accessible from all...
Hi all,
I have a routing table set up on a router with multiple interfaces and using static routing.
I have one interface which goes out to the internet via a firewall.
We have a default route pointing out an internal interface that does not access the internet.
What I am trying to achieve is...
Hi List,
I have a question on VRRP. HSRP is also an option.
We are using static routing on our gateway routers.
I'm wondering if we implement VRRP, then how will configuration and router management be done?
When I add a new route, or reconfigure a port, which is quite common, then will this...
Hi List,
We have a 2800 router with SVI interfaces. We are using two of the HWIC SVI interfaces to access an MPLS network in trunk mode. The trouble is that BPUS are traversing from one VLAN+fa0/0/0 trunk to another VLAN+fa0/0/0 trunk.
We have discovered that BPDUs are crossing from one part...
Hi List,
I have moved a cable on a 2811 to a router interface form an HWIC in order to enable some QoS. The has improved considerably since I have applied the following:
policy map TC
class class-default
shape average 1000000
fair-queue
interface fa0/0
service-policy output TC
I can see...
Hi List,
I've got a Cisco 2811 with an HWIC connected to a new MPLS WAN. However we are getting sporadic traffic patterns and large traffic drops at the service provider due to the MPLS Policing traffic over 1Mbit to drop.
I need to apply some sort of QoS in order to get consistent traffic...
Hi,
I have the following static routing set up on a Cisco router.
I am trying to route to the 10.53.8.0 subnet which should have a next hop of 192.168.201.246, however traceroute always shows it's next hop going to 192.168.201.248.
Everything else is connected and working fine on the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.