Search results for query: *

I've got an option 11 and believe me when i say my experience is limited int his regard. I'm trying to figure out what phones are capable of calling where (external, long dis., 911, ect.) i believe in my system this is defined by TGAR and NCOS, but how do i check to see what the numbers for...

yesterday before going home i started an automatic upgrade for my SDM (i mainly use it for quick firewall editing), and just let it finish and left for the day. today I've come in to find something very strange. I went to make some changes to my firewall and found that my access-lists are no...

it' s been brought to my attention that our VPN has never really worked right. it seems that when people try to access intra net sites from the VPN it tells them website found waiting for reply but the reply never gets there. everything else seems to work fine (ie. VNC, RDP, network folder...

I'm not sure where to begin with this issue. it happened once while live and once while testing on the live system. in a network running a T1 (primary link), and two GRE Tunnels (backup links)and utilizing five routers we get the following. The T1 will fail (moron Cuts a trunk Fiber) and then...

i've got a remote site with an 1811 router, then i've got our main site with two more 1811 routers. i've got GRE tunnels running between the remote site, and both routers at the main site, and then i've got eigrp advertising the networks. will this load balance based on eigrp's link state...

Alright that's a bit of a misnomer, but really, i need ot figure out what my tgar settigns are and i can't seem to find a place to print it. i tried printing the AUT in LD 88, and i get an Auth00x message when trying to enter my customer number "00" Am I in the right place? What does the...

recently some of our users started buying new computers, specifically ones that run vista, and unless something has changed the SSL VPN does not support Vista yet. so i'm trying to accomodate them with a copy of the cisco vpn client 5.0.3. when i try to connect i'm gett ing the following...

i think i've painted myself into a corner. i've got a remote site, and a main site that both run on the same subnet 10.1.0.0/16. to connect the remote site to the main site i've got two 1400 bridges which run at layer 2. then i've got a VPN tunnel between two cisco routers making a backup...

i've got three cisco 1811 routers and three ADSL lines. i need our two remote sites to connect via VPN, or anything that may work over ADSL to the main office. my plan is to use a dynamic multipoint GRE tunnel from each remote site to the main office and i'm having trouble getting a good how...

So i've got five phones all 2616's that need to be notified if a specific mailbox has a message. we have an Option11 using a DSSI voicemail system. it thoguht i could make this happen by setting up mcn's on each phone with the desired extension but this is not working. ANyone got any ideas?

before i push to hard on this solution i'd liek to get some feedback on if it's even possible. the setup is an 1811 router with a single ADSL line coming in. we want to run two tunnels out to our remote offices. one will need to run spanning tree across it which i beleive will require...

ok so on tuesday the entire wireless network crashed. this includes every wireless device we have (2 cisco 1400 bridges, 30 cisco 1200 series IOS AP's, and a WLSE). By the time we found out, it was to late to catch much information but i can tell you that I was unable to get into the consoles...

so i've got a rather complex setup but here goes. the basis here is to let the systems on an internal network get to the internet for updates. here's my problem. and i'm not sure it's the ASA but when i try to get to the internet it can't find anything. worse, i can't even see traffic...

it has recently come to my attentiont hat although my e-mail is working correctly it seems to be sending from the wrong IP address. we have a block of five Ip addresses, let say they are 101, 102, etc. well the MX record uses address 101 for inbound e-mail. nat rules are working smashingly...

I've got a procurve infrastructure on my network and we are trying to start implimenting redundant links. here is the deal. i've got a remote site that has three switchs connected as follows wirelessA---------switch1------switch2 |...

i've got an 1811 router running an ADSL on one side with a block of five IP's, I've got a second 1811 running an SDSL line. our primary MX goes to the SDSL, and our secondary goes to the ADSL. the networks default route goes to the ADSL. Cisco is telling me that i can't nat traffic from the...

recently we have made changes to our network to include a redundant third party wireless link to a remote site. both main site and remote site are using HP pro-curve switches. Primarey link is provided via a third party vender with a bridged wireless link. secodnary(backup link) is two Cisco...

Recently we setup a Cisco ASA device. today i've actually implimented the device and am Finding that it's got a 10 host limit on the license. is there a way to restrict access to the device so i'm not topping the 10 host limit and traffic continues to flow. The stats i'm seeing is inside...

if you were to have say three interface F0, F1, and V1 and you had natting set to inside V1, outside F1 through the SDM would this caus problems with communication to and from F0, even though it is an inside. if so would this problem be resolved by by setting it as a nat inside interface?

i've got an 1811 that is configured to use a vlan on all 8 switch ports, an adsl line on F1, and a direct link to the Core Switch on F0. I'm in the process of decomissoning a pix 520 and when I enable the direct link to the core the internet gets knocked out. i'm running EIGRP for routeing...