Search results for query: *

Hi kvshetye, no, I was not talking about the DOS-based COBOL compiler. Although it compiled DOS-based programs I last worked with it under OS/2 (but it's the same COBOL.EXE, you are right). I wanted to install the NT-based version, and this did not work. Fortunately, the problem is solved now...

:-( Sorry. Talk too much and copy wrong. Must read: out of office.

Thank you, Clive! John, Derek and Britton are of office. I'm gonna wait or I try Fujitsu NetCOBOL for Windows Professional Edition that seems to be reasonably cheap although it costs more than ten times as much as one of the better C++ compilers. Still pretty hard times for COBOL programmers...

Who's that? A sub-supporter?

I already did it and got a reply like this: "Thank you for your SupportLine Registration request. At this time we are not able to process your id. The information provided is incomplete or the serial number(s) provided do not match the Company name. (...) Please verify this information so...

O.k., I'm gonna try (again).

E-mails from Micro Fopcus sounded like they would like to see a company's maintenance contract. In the http://supportline.microfocus.com/ Support page only the following items exist: # Object Cobol Development Suite * Object COBOL V4.2 for UNIX * Object COBOL V4.1 for UNIX * Object COBOL for...

O.K., now I understood. Unfortunately Micro Focus seems to have some problems with old serial numbers, no maintenance contract and lost Update diskettes or .ZIP file(s).

You mean: if I set the clock back, SETUP will install version 4.0.38 instead of version 4.0.07? How does it do that? I didn' see two COBOL.EXE in the archives.

I have installed an old Micro Focus COBOL Compiler that turned out to be Version 4.0.07. It Compiles, the linker links, but the programs do not run. Reason seems to be ADIS, Micro Focus' Accept/Display module. Programs with the compiler`s version 4.0.38 ADIS and runtime do run. Someone told me...