Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations Chriss Miller on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
-
why is CEF slower than 2801 interface speed?
We're using the router as a WAN gateway into an MPLS cloud, but the handoff is ethernet into our router. It's also running BGP and QoS. -
why is CEF slower than 2801 interface speed?
Awesome, thanks for the clarification! -
why is CEF slower than 2801 interface speed?
Stupid question but bugging me. In this link, it says a 2801 can do 46mbit CEF but the router has 100mbit interfaces. https://supportforums.cisco.com/servlet/JiveServlet/download/818817-20237/routerperformance.pdf Does this mean a 2801 can never reach speeds faster than 46mbit even though... -
Is CoS the same as IP Precedence?
ok, that makes sense. The device's value of COS = 6 is referring to IP Precedence of 6 (Internet). It just strikes me as odd that this voip device has Diffserv = 46 but COS = 6 when I thought it should be 5. Thanks! -
Is CoS the same as IP Precedence?
Hello, From my understanding of QoS for voice traffic, the TOS/Diffserv should be 46 and precedence 5. My question is, I have a device that list the correct TOS/Diffserv, but then has COS value 6. Is COS the same as IP Precedence? If so, shouldn't the COS value be 5? Here's the weird... -
policy-map on ethernet int 192k - why??
Thanks for the information. My serial interface queueing strategy is FIFO. Will WRED still work or does the interface need to be CB-WFQ? Lastly, if I apply WRED to the policy-map, I need to make sure the voip traffic coming from my LAN has the proper DSCP markings, right? -
policy-map on ethernet int 192k - why??
The voip phones on the LAN (5 total) are from a hosted provider and the codec they're using is G.729. Not sure of the sample size and all phones should be able to make calls simultaneously The router isn't running any sort of CAC, just the service-policies. -
policy-map on ethernet int 192k - why??
The router is a 1750 and the Ethernet side connects to a firewall then to the LAN. It just seems odd that more bandwidth isn't reserved. The Serial side is 384k and it has a similar service-policy. WanRouter#sh policy-map interface s0 Serial0.300: DLCI 300 - output : SERIAL_LLQ Class... -
policy-map on ethernet int 192k - why??
I'm reviewing a service-policy setup by a consultant that has only 192kb prioritized on an ethernet interface. I don't understand why you would do this on a ethernet int when I have 100mb and no congestion. policy-map ETHERNET_LLQ class ETHERNET_VOICE_TRAFFIC priority 192 class...
