Search results for query: *

You could apply a bandwidth statement to the serial interface. interface Serial0 bandwidth 1544 This is merely cosmetic and won't affect the actula speed of the interface, however, routing protocols and SNMP may depend on this statement. I beleive the CSU/DSU is responsible for the channel...

It looks like you have a bad route? ip route 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 Async1 The correct syntax is: ip route 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 Async1

The short answer is, a router routes packets via software, a layer 3 switch routes via hardware. They both have a "switching" function not really to be confused with layer 2 switching, but the internal switching that a router must do to pass data from one interface to the other.

The short answer is, a router routes packets via software, a layer 3 switch routes via hardware. They both have a "switching" function not really to be confused with layer 2 switching, but the internal switching that a router must do to get a packet or a frame from one interface to...

Here is an easy reason, like the person said before: reduce your broadcast domains...if you have a NIC thats freaking out, your whole network will hear it, and those broadcasts will have to traverse all of your WAN links.

OK guys, I will try these ideas, thanks a lot, both of you, for your help.

Yeah, you're right, I forgot about it in my post, but I did try that, I also tried accessing a website via the IP but still no luck, I think it might have something to do with NAT?

Hi, can anyone provide a sample access-list config allowing only certain ports (80,25, etc...) to be "open" to the public Internet and everything else is denied? I have tried for awhile but no luck, this is not making any sense to me. As soon as I implement this, port 80 is blocked...