Search results for query: *

Can you please post a 'sho int s1/0' or whatever the int the T1 is attached to...

I was kinda thinking that you can't even use an ip route to do a nat-type of config. That is the main thing I was confused about when I read the post. The reason is because when traffic is sent back out to that other external ip address, it will have a source of an internal address, unless NAT...

I'm a little confused as to what you are wanting to do(no surprise there, I'm confused most of the time). You are wanting to route an external public IP address to an internal IP address so when users connect to 192.168.150.45 they are redirected to the public IP of 64.14.x.x ?? IF SO, you can...

I didn't realize there were modules for VPN stuff. Yes, the one you would want to get is the NM-VPN/MP. As has been stated, however, you do not NEED it. http://cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps282/prod_eol_notice0900aecd8042e674.html it is EoS just like the 3640. Here is a description...

I'd assume so. It shows up in the config docs for the 3600: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/cis3600/sw_conf/index.htm simple way to check is to go on your router and at the terminal config prompt see if you get a crypto command. Router(config)#crypto ?

you need a cisco IOS? http://www.gegereka.com/ type in full name including .bin it should show up somewhere there.

A major piece of data is how many users in total and the distance between the data closets. Without this information, we are just guessing on what to do. As jneiberger already stated, all of your PoE questions are confusing and have a lot of misinformation in them. You should read up a little...

I agree, stacking isn't that hard to understand. A few minutes with the Cisco docCD is all you need. I'm more worried about advanced routing and switching concepts. A good CCIE doesn't know everything, but they know where to find and quickly understand information when they need it.

This was from a month ago. My argument was that since: interface FastEthernet0/1 ip address 10.1.2.68 255.255.255.0 duplex auto speed auto was already in the config, being a 10.1.2.x network. There was no need to have the ip route 10.1.2.x route statement since it was directly connected...

lol, in that case, I would say I know very little about "servers".I think the only place I could be of help is w/the Cisco stuff, Windows, and some Linux boxes. Hopefully sooner or later I'll find something...

Add me to your list of CCNPs without much experience. I as well have my CCNP and I am currently studying for my CCIE. Talk about being overqualified and under-experienced! ;/ I'm currently not working. I graduated college about a year ago and have taken an extended break. Since I have all...

Burt - I live in the St Louis area too. I'm looking for a job ;) It's hard trying to find an entry-level networking job when you only have 2 years of experience, yet a whole lot of knowledge ;/ anyways, ya I saw AG Edwards and thought you may live around here. That's cool. -E

Regardless of the odd configuration of public IP addresses on the inside of the network, his setup should still be working and functional and it is not. I don't think having public IP addresses on the inside of the network has anything to do w/why it isn't working.

Just to add, the OP may want to read this section of the doc: Switch Stack Offline Configuration You can use the offline configuration feature to provision (to supply a configuration to) a new switch before it joins the switch stack. You can configure in advance the stack member number, the...

It wasn't until I checked out the docs on switch stacking that I realized how redundant it really is. Even if one switch goes down; due to the stack connections, it should always find a way to the uplink switch. If the uplink switch goes down nothing gets out(unless you had that 2nd uplink like...

Is there a firewall? I'm assuming you're pinging from the inside of your network? Where within your network are you trying to ping the webserver? From the outside, you can't ping an inside address. Essentially if you tried that, you'd be pinging the "Actual" 192.0.1.5 address on the Internet...

I think I may know what you're trying to do. Correct me if I'm wrong. So, if you have a router and if the 192 network is on 1 interface and the 10 network is on a separate interface.. The 192 interface will be the nat inside interface. The 10 interface will be the nat outside interface. You...

So you want a client on the inside of your network, when connecting to a private IP of 192.168.1.100 to be NAT'd to a private IP of 10.20.30.100 on the same inside network?

In the Cisco docCD there are a few variations of the command. ip verify unicast reachable-via SEC2-297 ip verify unicast reverse-path SEC2-293 Master Command List: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios124/124mindx/124index.htm#LTR_I

So R1 and R2 only have 2 interfaces in total and they are both connected to the switch?? Is anything else connected to the routers? How are users getting out to the Internet? If the switch is layer 2, and there is nothing else connected to the routers. You should be able to get rid of 1 of...