This can't be right, it's on our 2951:
GigabitEthernet0/0 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is PQ3_TSEC, address is f866.f2dd.8820 (bia f866.f2dd.8820)
GigabitEthernet0/1 is down, line protocol is down
Hardware is PQ3_TSEC, address is f866.f2dd.8820 (bia f866.f2dd.8821)
It's connected...
Thanks. The confusion I have is due to the examples in the BGP book which show peers learning each others' routes without any network statements. I'll look closer, maybe there is redistribution going on which I missed.
1. OSPF config hints:
your mask on R-1 loopback is /30 but the mask under the OSPF routing process is 0.0.0.255, don't mix masks! It's preferable to use /32 (host route mask) on a loopback -> 255.255.255.255 for neatness BUT you don't even need to advertise it's subnet (AKA host route) because...
My bad, copied the same router config twice. Attached is new corrected file along with:
<b>sh ip bgp summary</b>
and
<b>sh ip int brief </b>
AND the results of removing the network statements on Tuscon (routes disappear from Dallas' bpg table)
For grins, did not remove network statement on...
Setting up 2 BGP peers in same AS in a lab. As I understand BGP you don't need explicit network statements in BGP for directly connected peers to advertise routes to each other yet the directly connected ethernet ports' subnets won't show up in the connected routers bgp table unless I put them in.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.