Search results for query: *

Hi comstocb I woldnt object to acknowledging the contribution M$ has made to the PC culture (PCs for idiots,absolutely no technical knowledge required to use it)Their appraoch has really opened up the pc to the hoi poloi. thats ok What I really object to is their arrogance and lack of business...

Gentlemen Thank you sincerely for your knowledgeable contributions to this topic, of which the basic concern is interenet insecurity. I have been following various sites (including grc.com) to learn about these vulnerabilities. A year ago I was pretty much untroubled by such worries. Then I...

i manarth and gulkan I agree that my recollections are indeed confused and I am trying to get my act together here. I will indeed dig further and follow your links and , bear with me, I hope to find this white paper for your erudite perusal :-}. This may take some time but I will get there My...

Hi guys Forgive me for pursuing my particular assertion (M$ did compromise the original integrity of the protocol) but about 6 months ago I came across a linked article about the origins of the tcp/ip system. It was a paper written by an erudite source (maybe an MIT professor or such). It...

Hi guys Im not an expert in this area but I remember reading an article some time ago about the origins of the current "insecure" network protocol. We started out with a unix based system which was then bastardised by M$ which made the packet switching thing inherently insecure -...