Search results for query: *

The connection is just a charter cable connection. I am not using a proxy. I agree the ms seem too small for a packet to be going all the way to switzerland and back. Seems weird, maybe charter has a direct connection to telia???? Bill

Not sure if this is the correct forus but here goes: 6 crr02kgpttn-tge-0-3-0-5.kgpt.tn.charter.com (96.34.71.195) 12.818 ms crr02kgpttn-tge-0-3-0-4.kgpt.tn.charter.com (96.34.71.193) 12.338 ms crr02kgpttn-tge-0-0-0-7.kgpt.tn.charter.com (96.34.71.83) 11.782 ms 7...

Can you post the output from both? Bill

What do you mean the OID is missing from the MIB? If you do a walk on the router do you see the object? How did the oid disappear from a MIB? Bill

Could always try strace or truss, maybe that would help?? Bill

What do you mean dump more data? Bill

I am not that familiar with snmptranslate but my only guess would be specifying on the command line tells it which MIB to search. Might be better to ask this directly to the net-snmp guys. Bill

Can you post the MIB or at least the table part? Bill

I figured out my problem, you can disregard the above question. Bill

This is in packet tracer. I was working on a lab someone did and there is a serial connection between two routers /w hdlc encapsulation. R1 <-> R2 <-> R3 These two talk fine R1: Serial0/0/0 is up, line protocol is up (connected) Hardware is HD64570 Internet address is 10.1.1.1/30 MTU...

Well you could look at the raw data packet. Do a getone on that single object and look for the OID in the varbind. There may also be some option in netsnmp's snmpwalk to not resolve the OID to name. Bill

You are wanting the OID as in 1.3.6.1..... or something else? My apologies but I am unclear. Bill

Most likely not, at least not directly. Almost all firewalls will block SNMP requests. There are ways around this say write a script on a server to collect the data and then present that on a web page. Most firewalls will let http traffic through. Hold it, when you say a server on the...

I thought I knew what a valid IPv6 address looked like but obviously not. So assuming you have only one set of ::'s, valid hex digits, the correct number of "16-bit sections", what can make an ipv6 address invalid? Sorry if this is too vague. Bill

If you have money, I am pretty sure there is a solution out there for you. How much memory are you talking about? Bill

Can't remember but keep it as a reasonable size. A little under 1500 bytes is good. Unlike v3, there is no maxMsgSize field. Why are you developing a snmp agent from scratch? There is good freeware out there and some excellent professional agents out there. Bill

According to Odom, the router sees both paths as equal and going to the same place. So, it attempts to load balance over both links. Thanks, Bill

It does look like it is load balancing, but R0# show ip CEF 2.2.2.2 internal ^ % Invalid input detected at '^' marker. From the bottom PC PC>tracert 2.2.2.2 Tracing route to 2.2.2.2 over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 9 ms 10 ms 10 ms 10.10.100.1 2 13 ms...

Sorry, it was RIPv1. I did not issue auto-summary. I wanted it to mess up. Don't even know what CEF is(I know I could google it). There is no load balancing whatsoever. It just configured the interfaces, turned on RIPv1, and added some network commands. Like I said, I know why it is messed...

So I setup a router with a 2.2.2.0 network on one side and a 2.2.3.0 network on the other. It is not directly connected to either network. I used RIP and got the expected problems.(when pinging 2.2.2.1 ir 2.2.3.1 it didn't know which RIP route to choose). My question is what is going on...