ip route 10.1.2.0 255.255.255.0 FastEthernet0/1
It is best practice to point static routes across Ethernet interfaces to the next hop IP address to avoid ARP lookups.
Found this while troubleshooting an issue and as soon as this was changed to the next hop IP, no issues were seen. We thought...
Even if the ckt is fractional T1, the controller is still full T1. T1s provided by telco, unless Point to Point, almost always get their clock from Telco. So external or line should be the standard if there is ever a doubt.
No errors on the T1 but the Ethernet interface has errors over the same 12 minutes.
1058 input errors, 1058 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored
If the slowness on the test was through the LAN segment, that could actually cause the issue.
Tell us what speed the ckt will be running. If it's not Full T1, then you will need to map the proper DS0 channels for fractional T1 service.
Usually for most configs, you need:
framing esf
lincode b8zs
timeslots (channels) 64 (use channels 1-24 if full T1)
clocksource external (set to clock...
I'm not too familiar with DSL connections but
Can you post your sho int for this.
Is the 837 provided by the ISP? I only ask in case they have something in place to stop other forms of CPE being added to the ckt.
I see ppoe and chap. Those are two separate forms of authentication I believe...
You can see the issue with LMI from the debug. The sequence numbers are messed up (compared to the working interfaces on the FRS). Until these match up like the other interfaces, LMI won't come up.
Can you run a debug for Router 7 and for the FRS at the same time (and show only the Serial1...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.