TATATATATATA,
It works!! Simple but brilliant.
Convert the 95 database to 97 and to A2k and everything is OK. My tester is now testing the functionality but it seems perfect...
Thnx a lot
_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+_+
"May the source be with you my friend"
I could try to convert to 97 and then to 2000. Good tip. thnx
I already tried explicitly dim rs as dao.rs AND dim db as dao.database. Also removed references to ado etc.
I already tried everything you wrote. I have two pc's (one with 95 and one with 2000)
I installed A2k on a clean pc (without...
I removed the reference to ado. Therefore A2k only knows DAO and it should not go wrong. I also said explicitely in code that the recordset is a dao recordset. It didn't help.
I asked two questions:
1. why does dao3.6 not recognize rs.update in my code
2. why is some code removed while...
Hello,
I'm trying to convert an access95 application to Access2000(A2k). According to the whitepaper from microsoft A2k uses only DAO3.60. My access95 application uses Dao3.0.
Before converting I have to set the Access95 reference to DAO 360. But....my application won't compile. It does not...
Hello,
I'm trying to convert an access95 application to Access2000(A2k). According to the whitepaper from microsoft A2k uses only DAO3.60. My access95 application uses Dao3.0.
Before converting I have to set the Access95 reference to DAO 360. But....my application won't compile. It does not...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.