Search results for query: *

We have two /27 addresses, but otherwise your synopsis is correct. The address the internal server is NAT-ing is just the AT&T one. I did call QWEST in an effort to determine what the problem is, and they tell me the protocol is down. However, my router tells me both line and protocol are up...

In my case, both T1s are intended for the internet. I've tried enabling CEF with the 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 static route, and I know data is being sent over the second serial interface, but data is not being received on it.

Here's the current config: Building configuration... Current configuration: ! version 12.0 service timestamps debug uptime service timestamps log uptime no service password-encryption ! hostname boygeorge ! <PASSWORD INFO REMOVED> ! ip subnet-zero ! partition flash 2 8 8 ! gateway ...

I tried running ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Serial0/1 and external access is stopped completely when I do that. Is that not the proper way to add another static route?

I believe the only protocol being used is the static route I mentioned above. If I run show ip bgp, show ip rip, show ip egp, etc all I receive is a blank line. What do you mean by "internal addressing routable"? We have a router connected to an openBSD server using NAT. The openBSD server...

I'm not really concerned with access the second T1 line from behind the router. All I want to do is allow packets coming into the router from the ethernet interface to be sent out both serial lines in a balanced fashion. I'm believe the second T1 line is configured appropriately (the line and...

The T1 lines are from different providers, and aren't even close to being on the same sub-net.

I'm attempting to enable a second serial line on our Cisco 2610, and am having difficulties allowing both the original T1 and the new T1 to work simultaneously. I am unsure if the issue is with the configuration of the OpenBSD server, or if it is the router itself. What do I need to do on the...