Search results for query: *

Found the Solution using NVSPBIND Cleared all the Virtual Switch settings from he Nic's and rebooted the server I was then able to get back into the management console Downloaded from https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/Hyper-V-Network-VSP-Bind-cf937850 (Hard to find as the original...

I accidently enabled "enable virtual lan identification for management operating system " In the Lan settings and I can now no longer manage the Host Server remotely Any idea on how to reverse this I can get into the console but cant find anything in there to delete it

...and it would be 6 mnths before all the tapes in the cycle are used When i do the Preflight Check i get No suitable media is available Ensure that * or any media in the scratch set of xxxx_DLY or a blank media is mounted in the specified group I have tried setting the following Options -...

Notes V6.5.2 When a user is in anothe of the companies offices the following message appears (usualy the fist day they arrive) "Copying synching Local Notes files to network.... x:\...\Bookmark.nsf" This can take 10 or more minutes to happen (synching with server in another country) Is this...

Thanks for the reply yes it was a 6509e We have a Meridian Option 11 which is being upgraded. The wish is Gig to the desk and price wise we can do this with the Nortel. The nortel for an almost identical setup is about 50-60% the cost of the Cisco so any training can be covered by this...

We are looking at replacing our switch infrastructure (currently mix of cheep switches and Cisco 3560's) we are looking to replace this with a more structured core/edge setup. We have looked at Cisco 3509's at the core with 3750's at the edge and Nortel 8310's with 4548's at the edge...

Thanks Further investigation seems to be the installer having issues in vista. even when com+ services are enabled

We use an application that uses Com+. Vista does not come with this installed. If we insatll XP then upgrade com+ remains and the app works fine. As you can understand this is not how we wish to procede. Is there any way to install Com+ into Vista?

Do you have any info on the box? IP address? Any username or passwords? If not then the only start point is to log in via the console and start from scratch. This will make licencing the box hard unless you have a Checkpoint contract.

second option In voyager each user will be set with a spicific shell option. default admin user will be set to /bin/csh All other users on creation will be set to /etc/cli.sh Just change the other user to /bin/csh and this will start the users in the correct shell.

The admin user will use the normal shell other users will use the clish shell to get into normal shell type "shell"

getting back to the question. I think the guy is looking for a simple solution. the server option with two nics would work but you need to make sure you allow IPforwarding (otherwise it wont alow you to route between nics) Microsoft doc on how to do this...

i can ssh into the box but cant remember the command to get into the normal shell i get the following prompt NokiaIP350:21> IP350 IPSO 4.0 A little rusty these days :)

is there an ip routing conflit between the two sites? is the ip address used in c2 also routed elseware in c1? does the pix and checkpoint in c1 know to route back to c2 or can it conflict?

usualy this is because it has been installed to use an external management server rather than as a stand alone install.

click the network on LHS then click the port tab at the top

The xcopy command uses TCP 445 microsoft-ds but you may need some extra ports if you have to authenticate udp 137 nbname udp 138 nbdatagram udp 53 domain-udp udp 88 kerberos_v5_UDP best way to check open up port 445 then look at the logs and see what other ports it is trying to open. Some of...

Checkpoint R60 to Corp Firewall 4 Anyone ever set up a site to site VPN? anything to watch out for? Anyone have any links to smoothwall documentation?

We have a section of our network that uses Clacc C subnets but they all use the same Class B gateway. How does this work? Subnets 10.1.1.0/24 10.1.2.0/24 10.1.3.0/24 Gateway 10.1.0.1/16

We have teied removing the Fixup on ports 1720 this removes the error but we now get busy signal(on VC kit) when trying the call