Search results for query: *

My apologies, NortonES2 is correct. I assumed the hardware would be identical.

Aside from SID issues, it should work.

I agree...but he's wanting to move the share to a NAS.

How was the share originally provided to the users? If they're connected to \\servername\sharename, then moving the share to a new server won't solve the problem of the clients pointing to the old share.

You may want to look for a web host that will provide your email services for free. I know Google offers it as do a few others.

Google is your friend. http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003/R2/trial/installinstructx64.mspx

You can't control individual servers in a blade server from a console, you have to either use RDP or connect to the Management Module in the blade and then control the individual blades. But...as Pat says if your boss installed Windows core then that complicates things. Is it responding to an...

Google gave me this...any help? http://forums.msexchange.org/m_1800432565/tm.htm

As Pat says...boots-in-the-office days are past us...this can all be done remotely now. For a few hundred dollars you can have someone that can assess your situation and setup the new server seamlessly do it and you get to watch and ask questions and learn from what they've just done...

If you have a domain login on a notebook system, you should still be able to logon to the domain account even if you're not connected to the domain. That way as long as they save their documents locally they will still be available at home. www.focusonthefamily.com www.townhall.com...

Unfortunately I believe it's only a problem they'll be able to resolve since it sounds like something else is wrong within the system you have. www.focusonthefamily.com www.townhall.com www.rushlimbaugh.com www.freedom-of-religion.org

I love the smell of a dead botnet early in the morning... ;) www.focusonthefamily.com www.townhall.com www.rushlimbaugh.com www.freedom-of-religion.org

Did you contact Dell? www.focusonthefamily.com www.townhall.com www.rushlimbaugh.com www.freedom-of-religion.org

Not doubting your capabilities, but you way want to consider hiring a consultant to come in and set it up for you along with a transfer-of-knowledge while they do it. While I was fully capable of doing my Exchange 2007 implementation, I brought someone in just to be sure and, to be honest, was...

How many servers do you have and why do you feel consolidation is the proper "next step"? Have you done the numbers on the utilization and determined that less servers would indeed handle the current load and then some? I'm Certifiable, not cert-ified. It just means my answers are from...

...are using. It is the load upon the server caused by the number of users and the applications they are using that you should be worrying about, *not* the number of users connected to any one server. I don't think you understand the issue enough to then explain it properly to your management...

We static ours. When we planned out the network we set aside a block of IP's for printers, servers, etc. Of course ten years later those "blocks of IP's" are full and we have carved out a different set, but the user never sees that. I'm Certifiable, not cert-ified. It just means my answers are...

Ditto Pat's response, to the letter. I'm Certifiable, not cert-ified. It just means my answers are from experience, not a book. There are no more PDC's! There are DC's with FSMO roles!

What are you providing to your users application wise? Just file servers? Application servers? Email? You need to tell us what your environment is. I'm Certifiable, not cert-ified. It just means my answers are from experience, not a book. There are no more PDC's! There are DC's with FSMO roles!

It's called RDP. Enable it on the server and then connect via any workstation. I'm Certifiable, not cert-ified. It just means my answers are from experience, not a book. There are no more PDC's! There are DC's with FSMO roles!