Search results for query: *

Hello all, On my XP Home machine, when I right-click an item in the start menu, I have the contextual menu that pops up, and I could click on a function ("Explore", "Explore all users", "Sort by name" and so on...) Well, the contextual menu still pops up, but for...

OK, thanks for the tip, now I know what's the IdleTask stuff. But can I prevent it from being logged in c:\windows\DchedLgU.txt (for it fills it with trash, and pushes out my own sheduled tasks logs) ?

Hi, When I look at my scheduled tasks log (c:\windows\DchedLgU.txt), it's full of lines like this one : "IdleTask" (TaskIdX) where X can be = to 1, 2, 3, 5... I have no such task in the scheduled tasks list though... What is this ? Can it be disabled ? (for it fills my log with...

Hi there, From a Windows 95 PC, I want to control and monitor the Internet Connection Share I have setup on my Windows XP (Home) machine. I know I can do this with W98, Me and 2000 only (through the setup disk ICS makes). I also know there must be a tweak to do this with Windows 95 too. ;-)...

Yessss !!! Right, I managed to do it. FWIW, here's the final answer: #referer & agent filter SetEnvIfNoCase Referer ^$ allowed_referer=y SetEnvIfNoCase Referer ^http://famille\.berne\.free\.fr allowed_referer=y SetEnvIfNoCase Referer ^http://bldanchald\.free\.fr allowed_referer=y...

Thanks for your hints ifincham and RythmAce ifincham wrote: So the key question may be are the two 'allow' rules effectively combined (logical AND) or do they act as an OR. You could test this in the google scenario by dropping the allowed_agent rule. Tested it: works like you expected...

Yes, SetEnvIfNoCase Referer ^$ allowed_referer means an empty referrer : cases when the url is typed or selected from bookmarks / favorites. I do want to allow access in this case. No, what I want is not what you describe. In addition to the null referrer case described above, I want to allow...

Nope, I want this to work wether the client has javascript turned on or not. And I know it *should* work ! Something's wrong, but what ?

Hello all, In want to block access to my site (say http://my.site.com) if - the referrer is not in an allowed list or - the user-agent is not in an allowed-forbidden list, For this, I made the following htaccess file : SetEnvIfNoCase Referer ^$ allowed_referer SetEnvIfNoCase Referer...

Thanks ifincham for your hints. I think I finally found a way to achieve what I want without having to negate any regular expression through this : SetEnvIfNoCase Referer ^$ allowed_referer SetEnvIfNoCase Referer ^http://friendly\.site\.com allowed_referer SetEnvIfNoCase Referer...

Hi all, (Q1) I'd like to know if it's possible to negate a regular expression in general, and in htaccess files in particular, and if so, what's the operator ? For instance, I'd like to negate the regexp ^Mozilla ...so in human language, the criteria gives "does not start by...

This does work (thanks all !) : <script language=&quot;Javascript&quot;> <!-- function swapDivs () { if (document.layers) { window.visibility = 'show'; document.layers[&quot;DLOAD&quot;].visibility = 'hide'; } ; if (document.all) { document.body.style.visibility =...

Actually NN says &quot;document.body has no properties&quot; (I guess this error makes it stop browsing the script, so the next line is not executed). Well, it's not *my* opinion ! ;o)

Sure, what you point doesn't work (the body is always visible). But I meant that somewhere in ---begin quote--- if (document.layers) { document.body.visibility = 'show'; document.DLOAD.visibility = 'hide'; } ; ---end quote--- there's something wrong for NN, because the...

Thanks fatbloke for the fine tip. I'd suggest a slight improvement (tested on IE4+, doesn't seem to work on my NN4, somebody knows why ?) : SCRIPT language=&quot;Javascript&quot;> <!-- function swapDivs () { if (document.layers) { document.body.visibility = 'show'...