Recent content by JBAS

That is avery rudementic way of doing it, the thing is that at a quick glanse like you said you can't really load balance properly, it will work but you won't have control really of where to direct the traffic. When you can and have got budget i would recommend to either get Geographical LB or %...

No problems, you are welcome. What i meant is that there is two ways you could failover that i know off; 1. The secondary IP could be held on a different server which is live and is currently in use in terms of traffic going to it 2. or you could failover to a secondary IP on a back up server...

That is right. I don't see or seem to highlight any downside, as long as u implement the whole system as per the way it was discussed. Make sure you do get the most in terms of testing and i would advise to do a test as well. If you are connecting to a secondary server unsure the same is always...

Hi again Your approach would work, however it seems long and complicated whereby you could set up this failover system on both main address. The beauty of it is that within the managed interface you an set up the time interval let it be 2 min, 5 or 15 to actually monitor the same by sending...

It sounds like you need something as i highlighted on friday, if i understood your queries right. It would be a Failover solution of a basic nature set on both your main IP adresses. That will ensure that no matter what happens you can keep 24/7 access to your site.

There is a few ways of sorting the problem out, such as implementing certain Disaster recovery tools... A good one is a system that will perform real-time monitoring and failover of a pecific IP address usually associated with a content server, for example; If the service monitors detect a...