Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations strongm on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Recent content by findmefast

  1. findmefast

    We have 18 remote sites connecting back over T1, need to configure MetroE in similar fashion

    Scratch that! Never mind - the module someone mentioned was indeed a "switch" module. Go figure - so it would not work, as "imbadatthis" said, unless for sure there were such a thing as an 18+ port actual "router" module. So, yes, we are down to "tunneling" and/or "nested QoS". Argh! Or, just...
  2. findmefast

    We have 18 remote sites connecting back over T1, need to configure MetroE in similar fashion

    Thanks. I guess tunnels or "nested QoS" ? No, I didn't expect 18 fibers, but if the one fiber can be directed to the 18 switch ports that will be built into a module? Is that even possible? Each physical interface would be like a sub? Heirarchical queuing and/or nested: Link I meant to say...
  3. findmefast

    We have 18 remote sites connecting back over T1, need to configure MetroE in similar fashion

    Many thanks to you guys! It works - both with, and without, the sub-interfaces. No VLANs needed but, I suppose we can set those up as needed, since it's all transparent to the vendor. Only 2 issues remain: 1) We must have sub-interfaces or equivalent, as stated originally - so, if we can't...
  4. findmefast

    We have 18 remote sites connecting back over T1, need to configure MetroE in similar fashion

    Ok, this is not Visio - just MS-Paint, believe it or not. Diagram may make it more clear. What would be helpful is someone with a "working config" to "sanitize" (take out your personal IP/data info - change it to fake data) and post the configs, so I can actually "see" them. That's what I did...
  5. findmefast

    We have 18 remote sites connecting back over T1, need to configure MetroE in similar fashion

    @imbadatthis: Thank you again!!! Yes, I definitely realize the traffic potentially can be sniffed, without tunneling. Again, I thank you for the detail on the tunneling config, which is most likely what we will do but, in the mean time, we just wanted to see it work with an old 'test laptop' and...
  6. findmefast

    We have 18 remote sites connecting back over T1, need to configure MetroE in similar fashion

    @imbadatthis (TechnicalUser) - Thank you!!! I think that is WAY beyond what we want to do. Just want to get it working with 'basic routing' and simple sub-interfaces. Here is sample: [MADE up some numbers on a 'test' network, here they are] [MAIN HQ ROUTER - 2800 series Cisco] interface...
  7. findmefast

    We have 18 remote sites connecting back over T1, need to configure MetroE in similar fashion

    Anybody have any thoughts on configuration for the above example? Thanks in advance!
  8. findmefast

    We have 18 remote sites connecting back over T1, need to configure MetroE in similar fashion

    Referincing: thread557-1474090 burtsbees said, "My FastEthernet 0/1 interface needs to be configured to allow our 18 remote locations to connect back to us. Previously they all came in through the serial interface." fa0/0(10.1.1.1/24)------site1(10.1.1.2)----site3(10.1.1.3)etc... With all the...

Part and Inventory Search

Back
Top