He wants an apperance for a number, not B channel. And the answer would be no to thebopps, line apperances are assigned to lines, not numbers.
I would wonder why you would ever want an apperance for a B channel though, I've always wondered why they assign a line ID to each channel as if you could say have a DID come in on only 1 channel?
Kyle Holladay
ACA-I, ACA Call Center, ACS-I, ACS-M, TIA-CTP, MCP/MCTS Exchange 2007
ACE Implement: IP Office
"Thinking is the hardest work there is, which is the probable reason why so few engage in it." - Henry Ford
I just needed it as a temporary fix. What happened was...when our PRI service provider ported a client's numbers to the circuit, they accidentally ported an emergency line that was supposed to be left POTS. The emergency dispatcher was used to seeing a line appearance for the emergency line. But it is all resolved now.
I figure they might use it for ringdown circuit. Only thing I've ever used seperate incoming line IDs for is a customer than had a ringdown circuit where channels 1-4 rangdown from NYC to a certain group of phones, whereas channels 5-8 rangdown from Boston to another group. Kind of superfluous in this day and age IMO, but really the only thing I could see it being used for?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.