Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations Mike Lewis on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  1. slaquer

    Streaming MOH Silence

    4.1 cluster with all three servers setup as MOH servers. MOH files work fine - I can put people on hold and it plays stored sound files no problem. Added a USB iMic with audio and configured a fixed audio source in CM. I made sure the name of the device was spelled perfectly. As far as i can...
  2. slaquer

    CAM Propagation Question

    I guess propagation was the wrong term, though I know for a fact the MAC will show up on the CORE CAM table (I tested this myself yesterday) in the exact situation listed above - this was counter to what I was expecting. I thought like you described - CAM is local to the switch and unless...
  3. slaquer

    CAM Propagation Question

    PC-->sw1-->sw2-->CORE<--SW3<--SW4 If a new PC plugs into sw1 with a static IP NOT in the correct VLAN (can't do any layer 3 communication) will it's MAC show up in the CAM tables of each switch (sw1 - sw4), just sw1 or what? I know this all happens on layer 2, but it the PC can't do layer 3...
  4. slaquer

    Possible Routing Problem?

    Clinic A - Three Vlans: Vlan 1 - 192.168.140.1 (Internal Data) Vlan 2 - 192.168.32.2 (Inter-office traffic) Vlan 3 - 172.16.140.1 (Voice) Clinic B - Firewall (192.168.100.104) Router 192.168.100.1 Clinic C - 192.168.180.1 Clinic A can ping everything at Clinic B (and vice versa)...
  5. slaquer

    Site-to-site vpn not allowing bi-directional traffic

    A couple of quick qauestions before I head off to class. I am not sure what you are saying here. In one sentence you say you cannot ping the hosts behind the Juniper, but then several sentences later you say you can ping hosts behind the Juniper, just not the Juniper internet interface itself...
  6. slaquer

    VPN Routing Question

    So, just point out how much of a moron I am (and for those who may run across this thread in the future), we are blocking that traffic from going out the internet with the 101 access-list, then permitting it to cross the VPN using 102. Correct? This worked great by the way. Thanks a lot you guys.
  7. slaquer

    VPN Routing Question

    I will post the PIX config tomorrow AM. Even if the conduits on the PIX didn't allow for those other internal subnets to pass, wouldn't I see my attempts to those subnets from the remote site blocked at the firewall (and wouldn't I see those attempts try to go across the VPN and not the...
  8. slaquer

    VPN Routing Question

    No I cannot. It tries to go out the internet. thanks
  9. slaquer

    VPN Routing Question

    I originally posted this over at the VPN forum, but did not receive much help so I am trying here. Remote clinic - Cisco 831 router - 192.168.180.0 internal subnet Local office - Cisco PIX firewall - 192.168.120.0, 192.168.140.0, 192.168.100.0, and 192.168.160.0 internal subnets L2L IPSEC...
  10. slaquer

    VPN Routing Problem

    Remote clinic - Cisco 831 router - 192.168.180.0 internal subnet Local office - Cisco PIX firewall - 192.168.120.0, 192.168.140.0, 192.168.100.0, and 192.168.160.0 internal subnets L2L IPSEC VPN tunnel works great, but the 192.168.180.0 users on the remote clinic (on the 192.168.180.0 subnet)...
  11. slaquer

    Conferencing Problem

    If an internal caller creates a conference (calls two parties, joins them all to a conference) it works fine. If an external caller calls an internal caller, and then the internal caller tries to join a third party to a conference (doesn't matter if it is an external call or an outside call)...

Part and Inventory Search

Back
Top