Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR COMPUTER PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you a
Computer / IT professional?
Join Tek-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Tek-Tips
*Tek-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...Thanks for a great forum. My problem was answered just by scrolling through previously solved problems. Great service!!..."

Geography

Where in the world do Tek-Tips members come from?
Arnold (Programmer)
7 Jan 00 10:28
I have an Access 97 database that is made up of a front end and a back end, both in Access 97. Just the tables are in the backend. I then link the front end to the backend with linked tables. Next I make an MDE file out of the front end. I have about 10-15 concurrent users at any one time. Here is an error that I get about once per week: I have a Purchase Order table sorted by the PO number and the item number, when I view the table it appears to be sorted correctly, but when I do a findlast of certain PO numbers, it doesn't bring back the last one. Even if I sort the table again, it still doesn't work. However, if I repair and compact the tables, it works again and it finds the last PO number. Any ideas on why Access would be doing this?

Thanks for your help!

Arnold
elizabeth (IS/IT--Management)
7 Jan 00 10:32
The memory is very vague but MS did mention something similar in one of the patches, I think it was SR-1 or SR-1. Have you applied them?
Arnold (Programmer)
7 Jan 00 12:34
Thanks for the input, but I have already installed both SR-1 and SR-2 and they didn't fix the problem. Any more ideas? Thanks for the help.

Arnold
elizabeth (IS/IT--Management)
7 Jan 00 15:27
This may be totally off but I was just wondering if what you mean by "last" and what Access means is the same thing. My understanding is that when Access compacts a table, items marked for deletion are deleted and this sometimes means previously-used autonumbers become available again, if no following number remains. In other words if you have 123456789 and delete records 2 and 5 and 8 and 9, 8 and 9 now become available for use.

My only other guess is the index is getting corrupted somehow. You could try deleting and recreating it.

Good luck :)

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Tek-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Tek-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Tek-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical computer professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Tek-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close