Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR COMPUTER PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you a
Computer / IT professional?
Join Tek-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Tek-Tips
*Tek-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...Brilliant! Your site is great...and saving me hours of time at work and making my boss think I am brilliant too! I also picked up on a thread that will potentially save us a lot of money in the future..."

Geography

Where in the world do Tek-Tips members come from?

MCD 5.0 and PMS restrict incoming calls to a room

pandabear1 (TechnicalUser)
3 Aug 12 12:17
Is there a way to restrict incoming calls through the auto attendant to a room that is checked out, but when checked in must be able to call into the room through the auto attendant.
bobcheese (TechnicalUser)
3 Aug 12 18:26
it may be possible to do this with the call block (interconnect restrict) feature on checked out status in 'hotel options assignment' however, something in the back of my mind is saying you cant interconnect restrict an ext with a vmail port but would have to sit down and play to be honest.
kwbMitel (TechnicalUser)
3 Aug 12 18:52
Ditto, never tried it, nothing suggests to me it shouldn't work.

**********************************************
What's most important is that you realise ... There is no spoon.

pandabear1 (TechnicalUser)
3 Aug 12 19:11
I tried that and call block is for room to room only, I tried the interconnect and it is a no go, thanks for the replies.
bobcheese (TechnicalUser)
4 Aug 12 16:41
i have an idea, but it is dependant on you using the embedded VM for guest mailboxes. I'm sure that when using embedded voicemail for hospitality the mailboxes are deleted are created on check in. If that is the case, and you set the AA only to be able to transfer to ext's which have a mailbox then you should not be able to connect to a vacant room as there should be no mailbox..... its a long shot but i am fresh out otherwise.
kwbMitel (TechnicalUser)
4 Aug 12 17:59
Sorry Bobcheese, The mailboxes are not deleted.

The messages are still accessible after checkout

The messages are purged on the new check in.

**********************************************
What's most important is that you realise ... There is no spoon.

bobcheese (TechnicalUser)
5 Aug 12 2:27
oh well.....just a thought
kwbMitel (TechnicalUser)
5 Aug 12 13:54
Can I ask why you want this?

No one should be in a checked out room
The checked out phone should be restricted from outbound calls if someone is in there (maid)
The voicemail won't take messages on a checked out room
What harm is there in allowing inbound AA calls to a room with no one present?

**********************************************
What's most important is that you realise ... There is no spoon.

Makkons (TechnicalUser)
6 Aug 12 20:57
Most hotels dont want any calls going direct to rooms , checked in or checked out,
as scammers pretending to be the front desk asking guests for credit card info is a known problem
pandabear1 (TechnicalUser)
6 Aug 12 22:29
this is not a hotel it is a hospital, I should probably have mentioned that but the same scenario is in place, there is no voicemail, there was no mention of voicemail in the original post. The check in and check out is a patient, but the same thing applies, no incoming calls to the patient when they have not purchased service. Whether a hotel or hospital same thing, no incoming calls when "checked out" by the PMS.
kwbMitel (TechnicalUser)
6 Aug 12 23:19
Sorry but if you mention Auto-Att, VM is assumed, especially when you're discussing Hotel options. Your indignation is misplaced. You did not communicate well, and as to whether they are the same thing, no they are are not. You spent more time bashing the people trying to help than explaining your issue, I'm out.

**********************************************
What's most important is that you realise ... There is no spoon.

pandabear1 (TechnicalUser)
6 Aug 12 23:30
assume nothing, there was no intention of bashing, if you took it that way it was not intended.
bobcheese (TechnicalUser)
7 Aug 12 4:14
@ pandabear, regardless the answer is no this is not possible via PMS
LoopyLou (TechnicalUser)
7 Aug 12 7:47
Thought call block was carried out via interconnect restriction. The help mentions being able to use call block to prevent trunk access. Therefore would it not be possible to set an interconnect restriction that stopped the trunks from accessing the room phones?

I'd tell you a UDP joke but I'm afraid you won't get it. TCP jokes are the best because you always get them.

Makkons (TechnicalUser)
7 Aug 12 8:49
I think the only option would be (Im thinking out loud) would be via COS , thats the only thing your really have control over via the PMS. The question is ...Can you block calls to a DN via COS ?
Makkons (TechnicalUser)
7 Aug 12 9:35
I just tested one possible scenario of putting the phone in (permanent do not disturb) via a different COS and then using PMS to change COS.
bobcheese (TechnicalUser)
7 Aug 12 9:49
you cannot change COS via PMS
pandabear1 (TechnicalUser)
7 Aug 12 9:54
thanks LoopyLou, I tried the call block with the interconnect for my room as a 1 and the Pri trunking as a 1 and that didn't work, I used call block affected interconnect as 1, when I read the docs my impression is it only blocked room to room calls but I could be wrong on that. I will look into that some more.
Thanks bobcheese, I was wondering how to do that with cos, you answered my question.
Makkons (TechnicalUser)
7 Aug 12 10:17
LOL, my bad, Brain cramp,,, you are correct.
bobcheese (TechnicalUser)
7 Aug 12 11:43
i think the call block feature relates to calls made from the room. NOTE: even if you do manage to get call block to work to stop the trunks connecting to a checked out room. You MUST make sure the checked out room can still dial emergency services via the trunks.
pandabear1 (TechnicalUser)
7 Aug 12 12:39
thanks for all the replies, I will try and set it up again today and do some further testing.
pandabear1 (TechnicalUser)
7 Aug 12 16:56
I believe I got this to work. I made the voicemail port interconnect 10 and the same with the rooms, then in the hotel options form I programmed 10 in the "call block affected interconnect number", set the call block enabled hour to 00 and the minute to 01 and the call block disable hour to 23 and minute to 59 (I took a shoot in the dark at this one, not sure if this is exactly how is should be with the hours and minutes for both. Possibly someone who has more experience with the times can wade in. This blocked room to room as well as outgoing calls as it should but also when going through the auto attendant the announcement comes back "I am sorry the person you are trying to reach is unavailable at this time".
Thank you to all who replied to this thread it was greatly appreciated. If I have missed anything let me know as I still have it setup to do further testing.

Call Block - Affected Interconnect Number 10
Call Block - Unaffected Interconnect Number 2
Call Block Enabled - Hours 00
Call Block Enabled - Minutes 01
Call Block Disabled - Hours 23
Call Block Disabled - Minutes 59
Call Restriction (Class of Restriction) - Internal 3
Call Restriction (Class of Restriction) - Local 1
Call Restriction (Class of Restriction) - Long Distance 1
Call Restriction (Class of Restriction) - Option 1 1
Call Restriction (Class of Restriction) - Option 2 1
Call Restriction (Class of Restriction) - Option 3 1
Check In Parameters - Call Restriction Long Distance
Check In Parameters - Call Block Unaffected
Check Out Parameters - Call Restriction Internal
Check Out Parameters - Call Block Affected
kwbMitel (TechnicalUser)
7 Aug 12 17:45

Quote (- pandabear1)

there is no voicemail, there was no mention of voicemail in the original post

Quote (- pandabear1)

I believe I got this to work. I made the voicemail port interconnect 10

**********************************************
What's most important is that you realise ... There is no spoon.

kwbMitel (TechnicalUser)
7 Aug 12 17:45
I meant to ask why the contradiction?

**********************************************
What's most important is that you realise ... There is no spoon.

LoopyLou (TechnicalUser)
8 Aug 12 8:03
Think the contradiction was not understanding or not remembering that the AA in most cases is delivered via a voicemail of some flavour.

I'd tell you a UDP joke but I'm afraid you won't get it. TCP jokes are the best because you always get them.

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Tek-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Tek-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Tek-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical computer professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Tek-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close