Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations Mike Lewis on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

procedure pointer to function/subroutine in derived type

Status
Not open for further replies.

zhouxian

Technical User
Mar 10, 2010
5
US
type has component which is a procedure pointer to function. The function will return an array. But by calling the pointer , I got trash value and when I tried to find the size of returned array from the call from the procedure pointer, the compiler showed error
" An array-valued argument is required in this context."
If I change function to the form of subroutine, there is no such a problem. Please run the following code and help me with this problem.


compiler : linux+ifort 11.1 intel ifort version. 11.1
-------source code ------------


module type_module
implicit none

type test_type
procedure(fun_interface), nopass, pointer :: fun_ptr
procedure(sub_interface), nopass, pointer :: sub_ptr

end type test_type

abstract interface
function fun_interface(n,x) result(f)
integer, intent(in) :: n
double precision, intent(in) :: x(n)
double precision :: f(n)
end function fun_interface
subroutine sub_interface(n,x,f)
integer, intent(in) :: n
double precision, intent(in) :: x(n)
double precision :: f(n)
end subroutine sub_interface
end interface

contains
subroutine test_type_constructor(test, fun,sub)

interface
function fun(n,x) result(f)
integer, intent(in) :: n
double precision, intent(in) :: x(n)
double precision :: f(n)
end function fun
subroutine sub(n,x,f)
integer, intent(in) :: n
double precision, intent(in) :: x(n)
double precision :: f(n)
end subroutine sub
end interface

type(test_type) :: test
test%fun_ptr => fun;
test%sub_ptr => sub;
end subroutine test_type_constructor
end module type_module

program main
use type_module
type(test_type) :: test
integer :: n =2 ;
double precision :: x(2), f(2)
call test_type_constructor (test, fun1,sub1)
x = (/-1.d0, 1.d0/);
f = 0.d0;
call test%sub_ptr(n,x,f)
print *, " f from call fun ", f;

f = test%fun_ptr(n,x);
print *, " f from call fun ", f;
! Why the following does not work
!print *, " size of returned value from fun_ptr ", size(test%fun_ptr(n,x));

contains

function fun1 (n,x ) result (f )
integer, intent(in) :: n
double precision, intent(in) :: x(n)
double precision :: f(n)
! try this
f = 2.0*x ;
! or this , both give WRONG results
call sub1(n,x,f)
end function fun1

subroutine sub1(n,x,f)
integer, intent(in) :: n
double precision, intent(in) :: x(n)
double precision :: f(n)
f = 2.0*x ;
end subroutine sub1


end program
 
I tried your example with gfortran and g95.
With gfortran I got errors like:
Code:
Error: Fortran 2003: Procedure components at (1) are not yet implemented in gfortran
In g95 I got this error:
Code:
$ g95 zhouxian.f95 -o zhouxian  -fbounds-check -g
In file zhouxian.f95:50

      call test_type_constructor (test, fun1,sub1)
                                        1
Error: Internal procedure 'fun1' at (1) cannot be used as an actual argument

so I changed your code - I defined the fun1 and sub1 in the module named funcs:
Code:
[COLOR=#a020f0]module[/color] type_module
  [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]implicit[/b][/color] [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]none[/b][/color]

  [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]type[/b][/color] test_type
    [COLOR=#a020f0]procedure[/color](fun_interface), nopass, [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]pointer[/b][/color] :: fun_ptr
    [COLOR=#a020f0]procedure[/color](sub_interface), nopass, [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]pointer[/b][/color] :: sub_ptr    
  [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]end type[/b][/color] test_type

  abstract [COLOR=#a020f0]interface[/color]
    [COLOR=#a020f0]function[/color] fun_interface(n,x) [COLOR=#a020f0]result[/color](f)
      [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]integer[/b][/color], [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]intent[/b][/color]([COLOR=#2e8b57][b]in[/b][/color]) :: n
      [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]double precision[/b][/color], [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]intent[/b][/color]([COLOR=#2e8b57][b]in[/b][/color]) :: x(n)
      [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]double precision[/b][/color] :: f(n)
    [COLOR=#a020f0]end function[/color] fun_interface
    [COLOR=#a020f0]subroutine[/color]  sub_interface(n,x,f)
      [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]integer[/b][/color], [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]intent[/b][/color]([COLOR=#2e8b57][b]in[/b][/color]) :: n
      [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]double precision[/b][/color], [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]intent[/b][/color]([COLOR=#2e8b57][b]in[/b][/color]) :: x(n)
      [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]double precision[/b][/color] :: f(n)
    [COLOR=#a020f0]end subroutine[/color] sub_interface
  [COLOR=#a020f0]end interface[/color]  

  [COLOR=#a020f0]contains[/color]

  [COLOR=#a020f0]subroutine[/color]  test_type_constructor(test, fun,sub)    
    [COLOR=#a020f0]interface[/color]
      [COLOR=#a020f0]function[/color] fun(n,x) [COLOR=#a020f0]result[/color](f)
        [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]integer[/b][/color], [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]intent[/b][/color]([COLOR=#2e8b57][b]in[/b][/color]) :: n
        [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]double precision[/b][/color], [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]intent[/b][/color]([COLOR=#2e8b57][b]in[/b][/color]) :: x(n)
        [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]double precision[/b][/color] :: f(n)
      [COLOR=#a020f0]end function[/color] fun
      [COLOR=#a020f0]subroutine[/color]  sub(n,x,f)
        [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]integer[/b][/color], [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]intent[/b][/color]([COLOR=#2e8b57][b]in[/b][/color]) :: n
        [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]double precision[/b][/color], [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]intent[/b][/color]([COLOR=#2e8b57][b]in[/b][/color]) :: x(n)
        [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]double precision[/b][/color] :: f(n)
      [COLOR=#a020f0]end subroutine[/color] sub
    [COLOR=#a020f0]end interface[/color]  

    [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]type[/b][/color](test_type) :: test
    test%fun_ptr [COLOR=#804040][b]=>[/b][/color] fun;
    test%sub_ptr [COLOR=#804040][b]=>[/b][/color] sub;
  [COLOR=#a020f0]end subroutine[/color] test_type_constructor
[COLOR=#a020f0]end module[/color] type_module
 
[COLOR=#a020f0]module[/color] funcs
  [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]implicit[/b][/color] [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]none[/b][/color]

  [COLOR=#a020f0]contains[/color]

  [COLOR=#a020f0]function[/color] fun1 (n,x ) [COLOR=#a020f0]result[/color] (f )
    [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]integer[/b][/color], [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]intent[/b][/color]([COLOR=#2e8b57][b]in[/b][/color]) :: n
    [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]double precision[/b][/color], [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]intent[/b][/color]([COLOR=#2e8b57][b]in[/b][/color]) :: x(n)
    [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]double precision[/b][/color] :: f(n)
    [COLOR=#0000ff]! try this[/color]
    f [COLOR=#804040][b]=[/b][/color] [COLOR=#ff00ff]2.0[/color][COLOR=#804040][b]*[/b][/color]x ;
    [COLOR=#0000ff]! or this , both give WRONG results[/color]
    [COLOR=#a020f0]call[/color]  sub1(n,x,f)
  [COLOR=#a020f0]end function[/color] fun1

  [COLOR=#a020f0]subroutine[/color] sub1(n,x,f)
    [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]integer[/b][/color], [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]intent[/b][/color]([COLOR=#2e8b57][b]in[/b][/color]) :: n
    [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]double precision[/b][/color], [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]intent[/b][/color]([COLOR=#2e8b57][b]in[/b][/color]) :: x(n)
    [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]double precision[/b][/color] :: f(n)
    f [COLOR=#804040][b]=[/b][/color] [COLOR=#ff00ff]2.0[/color][COLOR=#804040][b]*[/b][/color]x ;
  [COLOR=#a020f0]end subroutine[/color] sub1
[COLOR=#a020f0]end module[/color] funcs

[COLOR=#a020f0]program[/color] main
  [COLOR=#a020f0]use[/color] type_module
  [COLOR=#a020f0]use[/color] funcs
  [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]type[/b][/color](test_type) :: test
  [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]integer[/b][/color] :: n [COLOR=#804040][b]=[/b][/color][COLOR=#ff00ff]2[/color] ;
  [COLOR=#2e8b57][b]double precision[/b][/color] :: x([COLOR=#ff00ff]2[/color]), f([COLOR=#ff00ff]2[/color])
  [COLOR=#a020f0]call[/color] test_type_constructor (test, fun1, sub1)
  x [COLOR=#804040][b]=[/b][/color] ([COLOR=#804040][b]/-[/b][/color][COLOR=#ff00ff]1.d0[/color], [COLOR=#ff00ff]1.d0[/color][COLOR=#804040][b]/[/b][/color]);
  f [COLOR=#804040][b]=[/b][/color] [COLOR=#ff00ff]0.d0[/color];
  [COLOR=#a020f0]call[/color]  test%sub_ptr(n,x,f)
  [COLOR=#804040][b]print[/b][/color] [COLOR=#804040][b]*[/b][/color], [COLOR=#ff00ff]" f from call fun "[/color], f;

  f [COLOR=#804040][b]=[/b][/color] test%fun_ptr(n,x);
  [COLOR=#804040][b]print[/b][/color] [COLOR=#804040][b]*[/b][/color], [COLOR=#ff00ff]" f from call fun "[/color], f;
  [COLOR=#0000ff]! This seems to work[/color]
  [COLOR=#804040][b]print[/b][/color] [COLOR=#804040][b]*[/b][/color], [COLOR=#ff00ff]" size of returned value from fun_ptr "[/color], [COLOR=#008080]size[/color](test%fun_ptr(n,x));
[COLOR=#a020f0]end program[/color]
Now it compiles and runs
Code:
$ g95 zhouxian.f95 -o zhouxian

$ zhouxian
  f from call fun  -2. 2.
  f from call fun  -2. 2.
  size of returned value from fun_ptr  2
 
mikrom, I do not have g95. Only can access ifort .

The problem still exists after rewrite fun1 in the module.
Is it a problem of the compiler?
 
I installed g95 and verified mikrom's result.
Thank you, mikrom.
It is a problem of intel fortran complier.
 
Hi zhouxian,
As the above experiment shows, the procedure pointers are not yet implemented in gfortran, but only in g95.
Similar in your case, it seems to be a problem with your compiler. But I don't have Intel Fortran compilers, so I cannot help you with it.
 
It is not implemented in the Intel Fortran compilers yet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top