Smart questions
Smart answers
Smart people
INTELLIGENT WORK FORUMS
FOR COMPUTER PROFESSIONALS

Member Login

Come Join Us!

Are you a
Computer / IT professional?
Join Tek-Tips now!
  • Talk With Other Members
  • Be Notified Of Responses
    To Your Posts
  • Keyword Search
  • One-Click Access To Your
    Favorite Forums
  • Automated Signatures
    On Your Posts
  • Best Of All, It's Free!

Join Tek-Tips
*Tek-Tips's functionality depends on members receiving e-mail. By joining you are opting in to receive e-mail.

LINK TO THIS FORUM!

Add Stickiness To Your Site By Linking To This Professionally Managed Technical Forum.
Just copy and paste the
code below into your site.

Partner With Us!

"Best Of Breed" Forums Add Stickiness To Your Site
Partner Button
(Download This Button Today!)

Feedback

"...I think the site is just incredible....I am learning more here than anywhere else before and am looking forward to being able to help someone .... this is my idea of what the Internet is supposed to do..."

Geography

Where in the world do Tek-Tips members come from?
Stevehewitt (IS/IT--Management)
15 Jan 09 12:18
Hi Guys,

New to SAN's so please bare with me whilst I scramble to learn - fraid I'm more of an ethernet man at heart...!

Got two CX300's connected to four server via two Brocade 200E switches in a full mesh redundant fabric. (two paths from each server to either SAN)

We've just purchased two CX4-120, another two Brocade 200E's and four new servers.

I'm planning on setting these up in a similar manner, however once they are all connected is is technically possible for me to connect one of the new switches to one of the old ones?

Or would it be more ideal to simply have a connection from new server to old switch than from new switch to old switch?

I appreciate that it will be faster as each server will have a 2Gbps connection to the old SAN (and 4Gbps to the new one); yet if I use a single connection from old switch to new switch there will only be a single 4Gbps connection contended between all servers - but is it fesiable to do this?

Cheers,


 

Steve.

"They have the internet on computers now!" - Homer Simpson

baddos (MIS)
16 Jan 09 14:57
Do you need to access both SANs from the same hosts?  
jjjon (TechnicalUser)
19 Jan 09 10:20
Steve,

It's certainly feasible to connect up the switches once you have it all set up, but would be a lot cleaner to add the 2 new switches into your existing SAN beforehand, that way you don't need to worry about merging fabrics.
Not sure from above, but if your 2 existing switches are not connected to each other then you can add the new ones to have 2 * 2-switch fabrics - I'd move the storage ports on the 4GB switches and the hosts on the 2GB switches. You'd have to judge how many ISL ports you'd need by the traffic that will be on the switches.

J

 
SANEngInCO (TechnicalUser)
20 Jan 09 11:39
Steve,

There are several larger issues here that you will need to deal with. First, the ISL's from switch to switch will take 4 ports away from your hosts and arrays EACH. So if you have 2 ISL's from each switch, you will lose 8 ports from each switch to accommodate them. Second, if you have a host connected to the 2Gbps switch and the storage on a 4Gbps switch and those switches ISL'd together, you will never get above 2Gbps to anything in the environment. Everything is always based on the lowest common denominator and in this case it will be 2Gbps.

I have an environment which contains 8 directors and around 12 non-director SAN switches and we do not have a single ISL in the whole environment. We have divided our environments out by function, string and/or frame that attaches to them. ISL are expensive (licensing), complex to set up and will "cost" at lot of ports on both sides of each connection.

For me, they are not really needed unless you need to transfer data between hosts or arrays such as a DR site, cluster or tiering of data. Without knowing your environment and what exactly you are trying to accomplish, I can't really give you a detailed answer on whether or not connecting the switches via ISL is the "right thing to do." But if you are absolutely dead set on doing it, make sure you have enough ports and that you connect the switches together before adding any hosts, storage or zones. Merging fabrics after the fact is extremely tricky.

Hope this helps you a little.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
Albert Einstein

Reply To This Thread

Posting in the Tek-Tips forums is a member-only feature.

Click Here to join Tek-Tips and talk with other members!

Close Box

Join Tek-Tips® Today!

Join your peers on the Internet's largest technical computer professional community.
It's easy to join and it's free.

Here's Why Members Love Tek-Tips Forums:

Register now while it's still free!

Already a member? Close this window and log in.

Join Us             Close